<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Economics Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-9643</Issn>
				<Volume>36</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Note on: Alternative Quantitative Measurements of Growth and Welfare for Policy Analysis</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>65</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>68</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15528</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/ies.2022.15528</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Tran</FirstName>
					<LastName>Van Hoa</LastName>
<Affiliation>Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Measuring development, growth and welfare is an important issue in normative and positive economics.&lt;br /&gt;The issue is more critical in developing economies where a good statistical indicator of income, living&lt;br /&gt;standard or poverty is crucial for decision-makers in corporate, government, non-government and&lt;br /&gt;international organizations in their for-profit or non-profit plans to promote business and trade, enhance&lt;br /&gt;growth and welfare, and reduce poverty in needy countries. In the current literature on development&lt;br /&gt;economics, trade liberalization for example has been encouraged through official negotiations and&lt;br /&gt;agreements and supported by the extensive technical programs of the International Monetary Fund, the&lt;br /&gt;World Bank, the Asian Development Bank or the World Trade Organisation and with substantial human&lt;br /&gt;and financial resources, to increase growth and raise income or reduce poverty in open but low-income&lt;br /&gt;economies.&lt;br /&gt;Several quantitative measurements in this context have been adopted to record the effects of this&lt;br /&gt;liberalization. The issue is that these different measurements can produce different outcomes casting&lt;br /&gt;therefore confusion on the impact of trade liberalization and the evaluation of the effectiveness of&lt;br /&gt;economic and trade policy (Winters 2007). This note is a simple demonstration of the sources of the&lt;br /&gt;difference in two popular indicators of growth and welfare, namely the rates of change of the GDP and&lt;br /&gt;GDP per head (called y and yh respectively) and their important policy implications. It can be regarded as&lt;br /&gt;a technical guide to the use of alternative income measurements for scholarly and practical policy&lt;br /&gt;analysis. The note also has some pedagogical and practical value, and its results can be applied to other&lt;br /&gt;areas of economic and non-economic activity. These include measurements of productivity, investment,&lt;br /&gt;consumption, inflation, education expenditure, labour skills, profitability, taxation, finance, bankruptcy,&lt;br /&gt;or other fields of quantitative investigation where scaled and ratio measurements are conceptually&lt;br /&gt;required.</Abstract>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ies.ui.ac.ir/article_15528_8dd386b86d7d74a0dffd78236f47fa1d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
